GDB Newsletter #16, June 2009
In this newsletter:
-
So
much for being a monthly newsletter J
Now
over 13M records in the GDB!
Well, it’s been a long while. The previous newsletter was published in
December last year, and I had expected to publish this newsletter about
February, after the AFFHO conference.
However, life intervened – such as having to go back to work as an IT
consultant to earn some money to keep supporting this site – and one delay led
to another … Perhaps I should add an
advanced degree in procrastination to my qualifications!
A lot has happened in the intervening 6 months.
The
growth of the GDB continues: it now holds just over 13M records. To be precise, the current count is 13,759,871. The number
keeps steadily growing, although more slowly now. We suspect that a majority of those who have put their databases
on to other sites have also put their databases on to NZGDB (or we have done it
for them), and now we’re into the harder work of attracting databases from
people who have previously been reluctant to publish on the Internet. Our message of security, that your database
can’t be downloaded from the GDB, is starting to be understood, but there are
still a lot of people who perceive too much risk in publication.
Perhaps
our new “Australasian” site will bring in a new set of Australian databases.
In January the Australasian Federation of
Family History Organizations held their conference at Auckland: NZGDB was there, exhibiting alongside the
LDS, Ancestry.com,
and others. Our stand was one of the
busiest. As Dick Eastman said when he
interviewed me, “I’ve heard some buzz about this (the GDB) this week”. You can view Dick’s interview with me at , http://www.rootstelevision.com/players/player_conferences3.php?bctid=14348105001&bclid=10538975001
In preparation for the conference we also
redeveloped the video guided tour, which had become out of date. In the year since we prepared the original
video many features that have been changed, and new features. You can see the current guided tour at http://www.nzgdb.co.nz/help/Videos/A%20Guided%20tour%20to%20the%20GDB/A%20Guided%20tour%20to%20the%20GDB.html. It is a good overview of the
philosophy and features of the site.
Since the early days of the colonies there has
been a lot of crossover between Australia and New Zealand, and many of our
users are ex-pat Kiwis (and a few are ex-pat Aussies). So it seemed logical to extend the site to
“Australasia”, and so we have now launched a new URL, www.anzgdb.com, which opens as the “Australasian
Genealogy Database”.
At the moment the two sites are identical
except for the heading at the top of every page, and the databases that are
accessible from either URL are the same.
Thus if you add a public record for John DOE with either the www.anzgdb.com or www.nzgdb.co.nz URL, the next search will find him
whichever URL the searcher is using. There is potential for site-specific content
however, and future developments might see support databases that are shown by
default only to one or other audience.
For example, one could imagine a shipping, cemetery, or place name
database that had different content depending on which site was being
used. However all this is in the
future, and as always we’ll be guided by user feedback.
What we really need for the Australian site to
take off and be as successful as the New Zealand is for a person, or a group
within Australia to become involved, partnering with us to extend this to their
area. If anybody is interested in this,
then we’d love to hear from them.
With the necessity to bring in some income, my
time to keep developing this site has been very much less than a few months ago
when I was working full time on it.
Within the GDB itself, there have only been a few minor changes, and,
apart from fixing a few errors, about the only improvement people will notice
is that the chart facility is now “live”.
Now, when you display a chart, you can click any of the cells and you
will immediately open the appropriate GDB page. Still on my (ever growing) list is the ability to retrieve
further chart data from the chart program itself (instead of having the data
emailed to you), improvements in GED processing, and easy scrapbook
uploading.
Most of the time available for development has
gone into FamNet, and with the support of a small but enthusiastic steering
committee, a prototype site for FamNet has been developed.
To understand what we are trying to achieve
with Famnet, have a look at the Powerpoint presentation at http://www.nzgdb.co.nz/NZFHN/New%20Zealand%20Family%20History%20Network.ppt, You can see the prototype site at www.famnet.org.nz.
The GDB is aimed at individuals, and focuses on
secondary data, i.e. research that people have already done into their family
histories. In contrast, FamNet is aimed
at groups and at primary data. Famnet
provides facilities to assist groups, simplifying membership management and
communicating with members. These
facilities can be added to a group’s own web page or used from FamNet by the
group administrator.
Like the GDB, the point of FamNet is to provide
the benefits of working together while allowing each group to remain
independent. The data remains the
property of the contributing group, who are free to remove it, update it,
restrict access, and so on. And
although users who belong to several FamNet groups have only one profile, so
that they need update details such as their email in only one place, membership
lists are separate and private to each group.
Membership management and communication is
useful, but the site’s real innovations are the tools that it provides to
create on line databases.
Administrators can create an on line database – of cemetery lists, photo
lists, whatever they like - and make it immediately available and searchable on
their own web site. They can do this
themselves; they do not have to ask me (as administrator) to do it for them,
although of course I’m happy to help.
Not only is their database searchable from
their own web site, an integrated search lets you know which databases have
records of interest to you. For
example, searching for “Barnes” in FamNet’s general search tells me that there
are 11583 records of Barnes in the GDB, 21 in the GDB’s shipping database, 21
in KYHA’s shipping database (KYHA – the Kiwi Yak Herders association – is a
fictitious organization), and one record in KYHA’s funeral homes database.
I can now click “Open” to go to the relevant
GDB or KYHA pages to search these databases, without wasting my time searching
web sites and databases with nothing of interest.
It will be interesting to see whether this idea
is well supported, or whether the present situation where each group’s
individual web site and databases remain lost in the web forest, undiscovered
by most of the people who would be interested in its information, remains the
norm. If the idea is well supported
there is tremendous potential for further development of this idea: the
prototype and the Powerpoint only scratches the surface of the ideas that we
have for providing advanced web services to the family history community.
Several weeks ago a post in the Rootsweb (NZ) mailing list alerted us to Lynda’s Lot, http://sites.google.com/site/lyndaslot/ , a web site with (among other things) a list of UK and Irish web sites of interest. NZGDB has long had a database of web sites, currently with almost 4000 web sites listed, and we have been looking for somebody to help us by looking after this, so I made contact with Lynda, and she’d agreed to look after the Useful Web Sites page and to join the FamNet steering committee. Welcome Lynda.
The Useful Web Sites page has been improved,
and now appears within NZGDB (and ANZGDB), FamNet, and Lynda’s Lot.
A
distraction over the last year has been an allegation that we had “stolen”
information from the NZSG’s web site. We first started hearing rumors
about this last September, but in spite of repeated requests for information
nobody from the society would tell us what the problem was. Instead, a
complaint was laid with the police. We were finally able to see the
“evidence” at the May meeting of the NZSG council, and we were very quickly
able to prove that the information had not in fact been stolen from the
society’s web site.
In spite of
this proof, there has been no apology from the society, and officers continue
to talk of “strengthening the security of the NZSG web site” as if that had
been the problem. It’s a great pity
that the society didn’t approach us straight away, as this would have been
sorted out in days. Instead, the
investigation has been time consuming and expensive (lawyers fees), and it
seems very sad that the NZSG seemed more interested in denigrating a project
that did not have its blessing than working to provide better services to its
members.
Robert
Barnes,
NZGDB Developer